Gangstalking: The Raw Truth

Introduction

Gangstalking is an invisible harassment operation designed to destroy a person without direct physical contact. It is the modern continuation of the psychological warfare techniques used in the 20th century: constant surveillance, social isolation, public humiliation, and the destruction of the target’s credibility. The difference is that today this process is powered by neural intrusion technologies such as Voice to Skull (V2K) and Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM). I have already written a specific text about these technologies, accessible and non-technical. Whoever wants can read that article here. In this text the focus will be different: to show how these tools are applied in gangstalking operations.

The most common mistake is to believe that gangstalking means organized neighbors, coordinated co-workers, or hired crowds following someone in the street. That version circulates online, but it does not correspond to the real engineering. Mobilizing hundreds of people permanently would be impossible, vulnerable to human error and exposure. What actually happens is more sophisticated: most provocations are fabricated by neural intrusion systems that project voices, phrases, and stimuli directly into the target’s mind. The result is a convincing sensation that everyone is participating in the persecution, even when no one is actually involved.

The central dilemma is this: gangstalking can, in some cases, involve real people — neighbors, colleagues, even family members — used selectively and strategically. But the majority of the harassment is artificially produced. The victim never knows when they are interacting with a real human or when they are reacting to an induced illusion. That permanent doubt is the essence of the operation: to keep the target in a state of total uncertainty, unable to distinguish reality from manipulation.

The KGB Model

Modern gangstalking was not born on the internet. It is not a new phenomenon. It is the updated continuation of an old system that already operated with surgical precision in the Soviet Union. The KGB (Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti), created in 1954 and dissolved in 1991, was for decades the greatest machine of political surveillance and repression in the world. After the collapse of the USSR, it was split into two agencies: the FSB, responsible for internal security in the Russian Federation, and the SVR, officially in charge of foreign espionage. Its function was not only to spy on external enemies but above all to control and neutralize internal ones — dissidents, writers, activists, religious believers, scientists, anyone who could question the regime.

The KGB operated on a simple principle: destroy without leaving evidence. They did not need to execute someone in public or put them on trial. It was enough to make them irrelevant, discredited, and isolated. The method was cold: constant surveillance, informant infiltration into neighborhoods, workplaces, and even families. It is estimated that in the 1970s and 1980s more than one in every 18 Soviet citizens collaborated in some way with the KGB. This meant anyone could be watching, reporting, and manipulating. Fear was total and invisible.

The arsenal included subtle physical persecutions, calculated to destroy the target’s mental stability. Dissidents reported telephone calls where no one spoke, only silence on the line. Houses were broken into at night, not to steal, but to move objects, erase documents, or install surveillance. Selective small thefts served as a warning: nothing was private, everything was under control. Many noticed presences behind them on the street — agents following closely, always visible, but without direct contact. These maneuvers had only one purpose: to feed constant paranoia, slowly corroding the victim’s mind until they began doubting their own sanity.

Among the main weapons was also social defamation. They created rumors, invented stories, spread suspicions. A dissident could see colleagues distancing themselves, neighbors distrusting, family members breaking ties. All without prison, without trial, without formal accusation. Just progressive isolation until collapse.

But the most effective tool of the KGB was the systematic use of psychiatry as a political weapon. This method became known as “punitive psychiatry.” The reasoning was clear: if an opponent was accused of treason, they might still look like a hero. But if declared insane, they lost all credibility. From the 1960s onwards, thousands of dissidents were committed to “psikhushkas”, special psychiatric hospitals controlled by the KGB and the Ministry of the Interior.

One of the most striking cases was Vladimir Bukovsky. Born in 1942, Bukovsky began challenging the Soviet regime early. He organized small student meetings in Moscow in the 1960s, where they discussed freedom of expression and denounced repression. The KGB arrested him for the first time in 1963. Then followed other arrests: 1965, 1967, and 1971. In all, the response was the same: forced psychiatric commitment.

Doctors, under state orders, diagnosed him with “progressive schizophrenia”, an absurd but functional accusation. The diagnosis had no clinical value, but served as an official stamp to discredit everything he said. When Bukovsky denounced torture, surveillance, and persecution, the automatic response was: “it’s a delusion, he’s mentally ill.” His word was worth nothing.

During his commitments, Bukovsky was subjected to degrading treatments: electric shocks, heavy antipsychotic drugs, prolonged isolation. The goal was not to heal, but to break him. He later described these hospitals as medical concentration camps. There was no need for secret prisons: the hospital structure itself worked as an invisible prison, legitimized by a medical seal.

In 1971, Bukovsky managed to smuggle documents to the West, including detailed reports on the practice of punitive psychiatry in the USSR. These documents were published and exposed the KGB’s operation to the world. The impact was such that in 1976 the regime was forced to release him, in a prisoner exchange agreement between the Soviet Union and the West. Bukovsky was traded in Switzerland for Luis Corvalán, the Chilean communist leader imprisoned by Pinochet.

Bukovsky’s case proved one thing: the KGB did not need to kill the State’s enemies. It was enough to turn them into official lunatics. The process was cleaner, more invisible, and more effective. No martyrs, no evidence, no blood. Only silence, discredit, and psychological destruction.

This is the central principle that survives today. Modern gangstalking operates on the same logic: the victim is attacked invisibly, discredited before others, isolated until collapse. What was once done with infiltrated neighbors, anonymous calls, break-ins, and forced psychiatry is now reproduced with neural intrusion, fabricated illusions, and cognitive algorithms. The logic is the same, only the tool has changed.

From the Cold War to the 21st Century

The KGB’s tactics did not disappear with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. They were copied, adapted, and refined by the intelligence services of other powers. States realized there was no weapon more effective than destroying a target without evidence, without blood, and without courts. Psychological warfare proved cheaper, cleaner, and harder to denounce than any classic repression.

During the Cold War, methods of physical persecution — tailing, silent phone calls, home intrusions, neighbor manipulation — were studied and absorbed by the West. The principle remained: break the victim from within. But the 21st century brought a qualitative leap. Operations stopped depending on large-scale human agents and informants. They became powered by neural technology and cognitive algorithms.

The transition was clear: what once required dozens of operatives in an entire neighborhood can today be done by a remote system with few operators. Permanent physical surveillance is no longer necessary. Harassment moved to the invisible plane — directly into the victim’s brain.

This is where Voice to Skull (V2K) and Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) come in. These technologies allow voices and sensory stimuli to be projected, and neural patterns to be read in real time. The practical effect is this: the victim feels that everyone around them is participating in the persecution, when in reality most provocations are artificially manufactured.

Modern gangstalking is, therefore, the fusion of two eras: the KGB’s psychological methods with today’s digital and neural tools. The logic has not changed — it only became more sophisticated. Physical persecution gave way to neural persecution. The target no longer needs to be followed in the street to feel surrounded: manipulation can be total without anyone moving.

Phase Zero: Neural Profiling

No gangstalking operation begins immediately. There is always a phase zero, invisible, where the target is studied in detail before harassment is activated. It is the equivalent of the KGB’s preparatory work, but now done with neural means.

The first step is brain mapping. Through Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM), the target’s brain patterns are read and recorded. This allows operators to access not only momentary thoughts but also specific personal memories — the ones only the victim can recall. Emotions and automatic reactions are exposed, allowing a functional copy of the mind to be created.

From there, a psychological profile is built. Every habit, every weakness, every latent fear is identified. The system records what generates anger, anxiety, shame, or desire. It also collects external behavioral data — daily routines, social networks, cultural consumption, social circle. The result is a complete dossier, where the victim is reduced to a set of exploitable vulnerabilities.

Next comes the identification of critical points. What past traumas? What are the deepest insecurities? Which themes are most painful when repeated? Where does the mind begin to give way? It is on these cracks that all the harassment will be built.

Only after this stage is the operation activated. The target does not realize they are already marked, because until then nothing happens explicitly. But when the system considers it has enough information, it goes into action. That is when the first voices, the first stimuli, the first social illusions appear. The theater begins, but the script had been written long before.

Human Participation and Illusion

One of the most confusing points about gangstalking is human participation. The victim feels neighbors, colleagues, or family members involved — and sometimes that is real. In certain specific cases, people from the close circle may be manipulated or recruited to provoke, monitor, or isolate the target. But that dimension is limited.

According to specialists like Robert Duncan, the percentage of direct human involvement is below 10%. The overwhelming majority of interactions the victim perceives are illusions fabricated by neural technology. Projected voices, auditory stimuli, phrases repeated at the right moment — all to create the impression of a massive network of people coordinated against them.

The dilemma is that the victim can never be sure. They may be dealing with a real neighbor who decided to collaborate, or they may be reacting to an artificial stimulus. That uncertainty is a central part of the engineering: the target begins living in a gray zone where they no longer know whom to trust. What used to be a community becomes a hostile stage.

The result is predictable. Even when human participation is minimal, the sensation is of total siege. The victim believes everyone is involved, when in practice almost everything is artificially constructed to seem real. This is how the operation achieves maximum effectiveness: making the victim’s own mind work against itself.

The Fabricated Social Theater

Modern gangstalking builds an invisible theater, where the victim believes society around them is participating in a campaign against them. This theater is not spontaneous: it is fabricated in real time by neural technology and by operators who know the victim’s psychological profile.

One of the most effective methods is false conversations in public spaces. Cafés, transport, queues, streets — the victim hears seemingly casual dialogues that contain phrases linked to their most intimate secrets. These phrases are projected directly into the brain through V2K, but with acoustic manipulation that tricks spatial perception. The victim is certain the voice comes from the side, from someone behind them, from a wall or nearby table. The result is the convincing feeling that strangers are speaking about them out loud.

Humiliation scripts are prepared based on the data collected during phase zero. If the victim has a physical insecurity, a past failure, or a personal trauma, these elements are turned into jokes or public comments. Each situation is choreographed to amplify shame and isolation.

Beyond sound, there are also synchronized visual and auditory stimuli. The victim may swear they saw someone laugh at them, show a fist, point a finger, or comment on a secret out loud. But in many cases, it is a montage projected by neural operators. The real person did not say anything, did not do anything — but the target perceives it as if it had happened before their eyes. It is this manipulation of perception that makes the theater impossible to dismantle.

And there is still an additional layer: modern domestic intrusions. If in KGB times homes were broken into, today the process is almost undetectable. Objects are swapped or subtly displaced, clothes appear in different sizes but with the same color and format — real physical alterations, not illusions. This phenomenon happens through technologies that manipulate electromagnetic fields to move or modify items without leaving physical signs of entry. The goal is simple: to show the victim that their home, the last refuge, has also been compromised.

The result is devastating: the everyday world turns into a hostile stage. Cafés, streets, transport, and even the home are no longer neutral and become fields of psychological attack. The victim lives surrounded by a fabricated theater where every gesture, every word, and every object seem coordinated.

Objectives of Gangstalking

Gangstalking is not random or free. It is an operation with defined objectives. The target is not just annoyed — they are pushed toward a predictable outcome.

The first objective is to induce irrational behavior. Under continuous pressure, the victim reacts to invisible provocations as if they were facts. They argue with strangers, talk to themselves, respond to voices. This behavior serves as a trigger for them to be seen as unstable. The next step may be prison, psychiatric commitment, or even a confrontation resulting in death.

Another recurring objective is to force the victim to leave the city or the country. Just like in the KGB model, there is no need to eliminate physically. It is enough to push into exile, cut social circles, and remove local influence. The victim flees believing they are escaping, but in reality they are only fulfilling the plan.

Gangstalking also serves to simulate mental illness. The fabricated illusions make the victim report situations impossible to prove. The result is the total destruction of their credibility. To outside observers, it looks like schizophrenia. For the State, it is the perfect excuse: neutralization disguised as a clinical diagnosis.

At the core, the central objective is always the same: neutralize without leaving evidence. Turn the target into dead weight — discredited, isolated, displaced, or destroyed. An invisible execution, without direct physical intervention, where the victim self-destructs in front of society’s eyes.

There is also a parallel dimension: the private use of these technologies. They are not only State operations. The rich, the influential, or sadists gain access to neural intrusion packages to use on personal targets — for fun, revenge, or simple demonstrations of power. For the victim, the effect is the same: total, invisible harassment. For the operator, it is entertainment or selective punishment.

Gangstalking as “Invisible Justice”

Gangstalking is sometimes described as a form of “invisible justice”, but that definition is just a facade. In some cases, the method works as a clandestine substitute when the State cannot act officially against someone — due to diplomatic constraints or the impossibility of acting openly. Technology does the dirty work without leaving a trace, fulfilling the role of condemnation without trial.

Thus, political opponents, whistleblowers, inconvenient figures, or simply chosen targets can be neutralized without trial, without formal prison, and without public execution. Invisible harassment fulfills the role of condemnation without trial. The target is pushed into ruin while the State keeps its hands clean.

This model is the direct inheritance of the KGB, but now applied in modern democracies. The Soviet method of destroying without evidence was only updated. In the past, informants and punitive psychiatry were the main weapons. Today, neural technology is at the center. Informants still exist, but on a reduced scale. Psychiatry also remains, now used as a convenient label to discredit V2K and RNM victims.

But most cases have nothing to do with justice. What exists is sadism, experimentation, and private revenge. Operators and elites use these tools for fun or selective punishment. The victim is neither judged nor condemned — they are turned into a guinea pig and a target of entertainment.

Modern gangstalking is not invisible justice. It is a system of invisible neutralization that takes many forms, from state operations to private abuse. Everything depends on the case, the target, and who controls the technology.

Conclusion

Gangstalking still exists. It didn’t vanish with the fall of the KGB and it’s not an invention of the internet. It only changed shape. Today, persecution is carried out through neural technology, projecting voices, gestures, and artificial scenarios that feel absolutely real.

Human participation still exists, but it’s limited and uncertain. Neighbors, colleagues, or family members can be used in specific situations, but most of the harassment is digitally manufactured. The victim never knows if they are facing a real human or an induced illusion. That permanent doubt is the most powerful weapon of the program.

The central danger is not just the harassment, but the reaction to illusions as if they were facts. That reaction can lead to prison, psychiatric commitment, or social collapse. The target is destroyed not by what others do, but by what they believe others are doing.

And in Portugal? The SIS knows. This isn’t ignorance, it’s complicity. They watch Portuguese citizens being tortured on their own soil and turn a blind eye. Not because they can’t act, but because they choose not to act. Because they participate, because they depend, because they sold out. The service that should protect the population has become an accomplice in invisible operations against it. They maintain the facade of neutrality while allowing neural intrusion and psychological harassment to be normalized as “delusions.”

The SIS doesn’t protect citizens — it protects the machine. Its function is not to stop torture, but to ensure it remains invisible. In Portugal, gangstalking isn’t just tolerated: it is a dirty State secret, disguised as madness so no one questions it.

Modern gangstalking is the invisible continuation of KGB engineering, now reinforced by neural intrusion and cognitive manipulation algorithms. It’s not a myth, it’s not a neighborhood conspiracy: it’s the upgrade of a neutralization machine designed to operate without leaving evidence — and with the direct complicity of the very services that pretend to protect.

September 2025

This article is in English. Read the Portuguese version ⇒ Ler em português